<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Janet Jackson Exposing Herself</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goodblimey.com/archives/2004/02/03/janet-jackson-exposing-herself/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goodblimey.com/archives/2004/02/03/janet-jackson-exposing-herself/</link>
	<description>Personal blog, and home to 2,748 mashups</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 08:44:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: horai</title>
		<link>http://goodblimey.com/archives/2004/02/03/janet-jackson-exposing-herself/comment-page-1/#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>horai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodblimey.com/archives/2004/02/03/janet-jackson-exposing-herself/#comment-230</guid>
		<description>I happen to seriously disagree with you on this one Matt although I understand where you are coming from.  I think that it was a cheapo stunt but the mere fact that America has so much moral outrage when we are quite happy to show dead mutilated bodies on the news and to glorify war as well as condone the ownership of firearms which are designed to be used for only one thing.  I feel that janets&#039;s breast is not really that important and as a parent I don&#039;t feel that my son and daughter are going to be morally scarred for life at the vision of a pasty.
My children are not ashamed of their bodies and quite frankly are not in the least interested in Janet Jackson&#039;s breast because that is what it is, a breast.  Not a gun, not a bomb or even a knife, just a breast and it&#039;s not going to hurt them particularly.  It&#039;s only our Victorian morals that actually class breasts in the sexual category and the sooner we get past that the better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I happen to seriously disagree with you on this one Matt although I understand where you are coming from.  I think that it was a cheapo stunt but the mere fact that America has so much moral outrage when we are quite happy to show dead mutilated bodies on the news and to glorify war as well as condone the ownership of firearms which are designed to be used for only one thing.  I feel that janets&#8217;s breast is not really that important and as a parent I don&#8217;t feel that my son and daughter are going to be morally scarred for life at the vision of a pasty.<br />
My children are not ashamed of their bodies and quite frankly are not in the least interested in Janet Jackson&#8217;s breast because that is what it is, a breast.  Not a gun, not a bomb or even a knife, just a breast and it&#8217;s not going to hurt them particularly.  It&#8217;s only our Victorian morals that actually class breasts in the sexual category and the sooner we get past that the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://goodblimey.com/archives/2004/02/03/janet-jackson-exposing-herself/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodblimey.com/archives/2004/02/03/janet-jackson-exposing-herself/#comment-231</guid>
		<description>I too have to express strong disagreement. The fact that America is showing profound &quot;outrage&quot; at the exposing of a breast is just pathetic. This mother of who&#039;s writing you showed us is a perfect example. Fine, if you don&#039;t want your kids to grow up to be like that then, here&#039;s an idea, don&#039;t raise them like that. Stop blaming the media and the world around you for the way YOUR kids turn out. Yes, there&#039;s an impact but in the end, with proper parents and a proper upbringing, its negligeable.

Look at England. They LAUGH at us with events like this. There public nudity is taken as a given. Hell, its in the newspaper (page 3?) daily. You don&#039;t see their children growing up to be demented. You don&#039;t see terrible damage done to their society as a whole. You don&#039;t see constant one up manship to always degrade ourselves more.

Why? Because they don&#039;t HIDE sexuality. They know its there, they&#039;ve accepted that fact. Why is America still hiding the fact that umm...we all come from sex? Well have sexual parts. They&#039;re there and for a damn long part of our lives its a primary driving force behind our every move. 

Please, while Janet and Justin&#039;s actions were tasteless and silly but its the REACTION to them that is sad and degrading. We cheer when someone gets decapitated in a movie but god save the world if we see a tit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too have to express strong disagreement. The fact that America is showing profound &#8220;outrage&#8221; at the exposing of a breast is just pathetic. This mother of who&#8217;s writing you showed us is a perfect example. Fine, if you don&#8217;t want your kids to grow up to be like that then, here&#8217;s an idea, don&#8217;t raise them like that. Stop blaming the media and the world around you for the way YOUR kids turn out. Yes, there&#8217;s an impact but in the end, with proper parents and a proper upbringing, its negligeable.</p>
<p>Look at England. They LAUGH at us with events like this. There public nudity is taken as a given. Hell, its in the newspaper (page 3?) daily. You don&#8217;t see their children growing up to be demented. You don&#8217;t see terrible damage done to their society as a whole. You don&#8217;t see constant one up manship to always degrade ourselves more.</p>
<p>Why? Because they don&#8217;t HIDE sexuality. They know its there, they&#8217;ve accepted that fact. Why is America still hiding the fact that umm&#8230;we all come from sex? Well have sexual parts. They&#8217;re there and for a damn long part of our lives its a primary driving force behind our every move. </p>
<p>Please, while Janet and Justin&#8217;s actions were tasteless and silly but its the REACTION to them that is sad and degrading. We cheer when someone gets decapitated in a movie but god save the world if we see a tit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Burris</title>
		<link>http://goodblimey.com/archives/2004/02/03/janet-jackson-exposing-herself/comment-page-1/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Burris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodblimey.com/archives/2004/02/03/janet-jackson-exposing-herself/#comment-232</guid>
		<description>Just because it&#039;s okay over in England, doesn&#039;t mean that it should be okay here in America.  Would it be okay that we forced women to dress in robes from head to toes, because it&#039;s okay over in Afghanistan?  No, our culture is a lot different over here.  People are raised different here, and their ideals and beliefs are different.  America is a diverse cultural country, and as such laws have to be made to respect EVERYONE&#039;s beliefs and ways of life.

Nudity on TV may not offend one family, but it may offend another.  So you have to play the middle ground and not offend either, and this means no amount of nudity or sexual acts on prime-time TV.  These laws are in place for a reason, they weren&#039;t put in by a bunch of Protestant prudes looking to burn witches at the stake, they were put in to respect a nation of diverse beliefs.

The reaction is sad and degrading?  Why?  You even agree that the actions of Justin and Janet is tasteless and silly, so why should they get away with it?  If you piss off millions of people, you don&#039;t sit there and wonder why, or shrug it off, you FIX the problem.  Running 3DGPU.com has taught me that much.  If 50 people complained they didn&#039;t like a blinking ad, I don&#039;t say &quot;other sites do it, so I can too&quot;, or figure 50 people isn&#039;t enough to warrant an action, I take it down, apologize, and don&#039;t do it again.  Because that&#039;s respecting peoples&#039; feelings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because it&#8217;s okay over in England, doesn&#8217;t mean that it should be okay here in America.  Would it be okay that we forced women to dress in robes from head to toes, because it&#8217;s okay over in Afghanistan?  No, our culture is a lot different over here.  People are raised different here, and their ideals and beliefs are different.  America is a diverse cultural country, and as such laws have to be made to respect EVERYONE&#8217;s beliefs and ways of life.</p>
<p>Nudity on TV may not offend one family, but it may offend another.  So you have to play the middle ground and not offend either, and this means no amount of nudity or sexual acts on prime-time TV.  These laws are in place for a reason, they weren&#8217;t put in by a bunch of Protestant prudes looking to burn witches at the stake, they were put in to respect a nation of diverse beliefs.</p>
<p>The reaction is sad and degrading?  Why?  You even agree that the actions of Justin and Janet is tasteless and silly, so why should they get away with it?  If you piss off millions of people, you don&#8217;t sit there and wonder why, or shrug it off, you FIX the problem.  Running 3DGPU.com has taught me that much.  If 50 people complained they didn&#8217;t like a blinking ad, I don&#8217;t say &#8220;other sites do it, so I can too&#8221;, or figure 50 people isn&#8217;t enough to warrant an action, I take it down, apologize, and don&#8217;t do it again.  Because that&#8217;s respecting peoples&#8217; feelings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: horai</title>
		<link>http://goodblimey.com/archives/2004/02/03/janet-jackson-exposing-herself/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>horai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodblimey.com/archives/2004/02/03/janet-jackson-exposing-herself/#comment-233</guid>
		<description>I think we&#039;ll have to agree to disagree here Matt because I have enormous respect for your integrity and I do not live in America so cannot comment but I will add that a country where guns are readily available in high street shops and they have more murders in one city that we have in the whole country because of these guns can get upset about a breast just leaves me in a state of total confusion.  Because of that confusion I feel that I probably will never understand so I think the best thing is to forget it and carry on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we&#8217;ll have to agree to disagree here Matt because I have enormous respect for your integrity and I do not live in America so cannot comment but I will add that a country where guns are readily available in high street shops and they have more murders in one city that we have in the whole country because of these guns can get upset about a breast just leaves me in a state of total confusion.  Because of that confusion I feel that I probably will never understand so I think the best thing is to forget it and carry on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian3DGPU</title>
		<link>http://goodblimey.com/archives/2004/02/03/janet-jackson-exposing-herself/comment-page-1/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian3DGPU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodblimey.com/archives/2004/02/03/janet-jackson-exposing-herself/#comment-234</guid>
		<description>As a father of four daughters, I see both sides of the issue. I do think that our society (America) is overly decadent and violent. My main issue with stunts like Janet and Justin pulled is this. 

I had no choice in deciding if I wanted my children to see it. I know what to expect on the news. I know what to expect with a R rated movie, or certain TV dramas. I would never expect to sit down to watch the Superbowl and see that type of act. It isn&#039;t even the exposure of a breast (Big Deal!) It is the sight of a man tearing off a womens clothes...not the image I want my daughters to see.

The problem with America, and society in general is the gradual desensitivation of sex. It has turned from something deep, beautiful and personal into something like going to the store for a coke. It is cheap and tawdry and that makes it extremely hard to teach young girls the opposite of what they are bombarded with by the media. My wife and I are by no means prudes and we are very open with the human body and when the time is right, sex. We try to teach our girls to respect themselves and their bodies</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a father of four daughters, I see both sides of the issue. I do think that our society (America) is overly decadent and violent. My main issue with stunts like Janet and Justin pulled is this. </p>
<p>I had no choice in deciding if I wanted my children to see it. I know what to expect on the news. I know what to expect with a R rated movie, or certain TV dramas. I would never expect to sit down to watch the Superbowl and see that type of act. It isn&#8217;t even the exposure of a breast (Big Deal!) It is the sight of a man tearing off a womens clothes&#8230;not the image I want my daughters to see.</p>
<p>The problem with America, and society in general is the gradual desensitivation of sex. It has turned from something deep, beautiful and personal into something like going to the store for a coke. It is cheap and tawdry and that makes it extremely hard to teach young girls the opposite of what they are bombarded with by the media. My wife and I are by no means prudes and we are very open with the human body and when the time is right, sex. We try to teach our girls to respect themselves and their bodies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Burris</title>
		<link>http://goodblimey.com/archives/2004/02/03/janet-jackson-exposing-herself/comment-page-1/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Burris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodblimey.com/archives/2004/02/03/janet-jackson-exposing-herself/#comment-235</guid>
		<description>Very well said, Brian, I agree completely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well said, Brian, I agree completely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://goodblimey.com/archives/2004/02/03/janet-jackson-exposing-herself/comment-page-1/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodblimey.com/archives/2004/02/03/janet-jackson-exposing-herself/#comment-236</guid>
		<description>Actually Matt, many of our laws DO stem from our Puritan fore-fathers. One can draw a direct correlation between the uptightness our society has with sex versus the difference of the English. THEY kicked out the stiff necked people that gave us so many stupid and troubling baggage that we still carry into the 21st century.

I&#039;m not disagreeing that there should be limits. I&#039;m not disagreeing that it was done in bad taste and that it should be limited but for gods sakes it was a boob. Its not like they got on stage and did the horizontal mombo or anything. It was a breast. You see more skin on the average beach than you did on that show. My problem is with the reaction, the overwelming sad reaction to what occured. You don&#039;t see it in ANYTHING else in America. Not in politics, not regarding our economy, not even regarding violence. Yet a breast becomes the MOST WATCHED TIVO EVENT EVER. Its now one of the most heavily searched items on the internet. Thats just...sad.

More air time and more effort will be expended on the two second clip of an exposed breast then will be spent on politics for the next year. THAT is my problem with this event. Yes, it was sad and tasteless but our reaction is worse. Like I said on my weblog, America needs to grow up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually Matt, many of our laws DO stem from our Puritan fore-fathers. One can draw a direct correlation between the uptightness our society has with sex versus the difference of the English. THEY kicked out the stiff necked people that gave us so many stupid and troubling baggage that we still carry into the 21st century.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not disagreeing that there should be limits. I&#8217;m not disagreeing that it was done in bad taste and that it should be limited but for gods sakes it was a boob. Its not like they got on stage and did the horizontal mombo or anything. It was a breast. You see more skin on the average beach than you did on that show. My problem is with the reaction, the overwelming sad reaction to what occured. You don&#8217;t see it in ANYTHING else in America. Not in politics, not regarding our economy, not even regarding violence. Yet a breast becomes the MOST WATCHED TIVO EVENT EVER. Its now one of the most heavily searched items on the internet. Thats just&#8230;sad.</p>
<p>More air time and more effort will be expended on the two second clip of an exposed breast then will be spent on politics for the next year. THAT is my problem with this event. Yes, it was sad and tasteless but our reaction is worse. Like I said on my weblog, America needs to grow up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Burris</title>
		<link>http://goodblimey.com/archives/2004/02/03/janet-jackson-exposing-herself/comment-page-1/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Burris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodblimey.com/archives/2004/02/03/janet-jackson-exposing-herself/#comment-237</guid>
		<description>Chris:

I always mix the Puritans with the Protestants.  Whether laws stem from their beliefs would be hard to prove, considering the majority of our laws have to be approved by the people, and not everyone in American follows the Puritan belief.  I certainly don&#039;t.

Once again, you&#039;re focusing on the wrong thing here.  People aren&#039;t upset because of a boob being displayed, it was the context, the place, and timing of it.  It was disrespectful to the common viewer, over 89 million of them.  It was disrespectful towards women, with a man ripping a section of the breast off, and the woman looking shocked and then outraged at the act.  A young child would/can interpret that the wrong way, and teach the wrong values.

Of course it was the most replayed event on TIVO, who wants to replay boring politicians or information about the economy.  The majority of the people that use TIVO are those who are using it to watch soap operas at night or sporting events they couldn&#039;t catch, which are people likely to be interested in a 2 second clip of a breast.  TIVO doesn&#039;t represent America, as much as you make it sound like it does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris:</p>
<p>I always mix the Puritans with the Protestants.  Whether laws stem from their beliefs would be hard to prove, considering the majority of our laws have to be approved by the people, and not everyone in American follows the Puritan belief.  I certainly don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Once again, you&#8217;re focusing on the wrong thing here.  People aren&#8217;t upset because of a boob being displayed, it was the context, the place, and timing of it.  It was disrespectful to the common viewer, over 89 million of them.  It was disrespectful towards women, with a man ripping a section of the breast off, and the woman looking shocked and then outraged at the act.  A young child would/can interpret that the wrong way, and teach the wrong values.</p>
<p>Of course it was the most replayed event on TIVO, who wants to replay boring politicians or information about the economy.  The majority of the people that use TIVO are those who are using it to watch soap operas at night or sporting events they couldn&#8217;t catch, which are people likely to be interested in a 2 second clip of a breast.  TIVO doesn&#8217;t represent America, as much as you make it sound like it does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paige morton</title>
		<link>http://goodblimey.com/archives/2004/02/03/janet-jackson-exposing-herself/comment-page-1/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>paige morton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodblimey.com/archives/2004/02/03/janet-jackson-exposing-herself/#comment-238</guid>
		<description>leave janet alone did she hurt any one?? no it is no worse than anything else on tv all these gay shows on tv it happened get a lfe get over it .!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>leave janet alone did she hurt any one?? no it is no worse than anything else on tv all these gay shows on tv it happened get a lfe get over it .!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://goodblimey.com/archives/2004/02/03/janet-jackson-exposing-herself/comment-page-1/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goodblimey.com/archives/2004/02/03/janet-jackson-exposing-herself/#comment-239</guid>
		<description>Actually Matt, just going by what you said over Tivo it does represent the vast majority of Americans. Hence why I found that so disturbing. 

I&#039;ll drop it though and just go with the &quot;we agree to disagree&quot; aspect. I don&#039;t want to come off as an ass with it because in general I do like your writing even though I just came across it last week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually Matt, just going by what you said over Tivo it does represent the vast majority of Americans. Hence why I found that so disturbing. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll drop it though and just go with the &#8220;we agree to disagree&#8221; aspect. I don&#8217;t want to come off as an ass with it because in general I do like your writing even though I just came across it last week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
